CYCLONE said:2004 CREW CAB 4X4 SHORT BED 285 TIRES
BMDMAX said:Nope, I can't say that. My truck has always made consistent low 500's with one of the hottest stacks around. It has never even come close to 544.
If I recall the big hubaloo on your deal you could not repeat the results either. Also, your numbers were consistent with just adding up the advertised gains from each module. If I were to make the same claim my numbers would be about 600 HP on #2 only.
If you truly did make 544 with that stack, why has no other HP or stack junkie done so as well? We should at least see more folks in the 500 HP range.
I have repeated my results on multiple days and multiple runs. I don't know of anyone posting evidence of consistent mid 500's on #2 with the stacks available of the shelf.
I really want to believe your 544 number. I hope your new DTT tranny helps out and you post the same or better. I was not trying to rehash that debacle in any event, I was just trying to figure out why my numbers are better than some others.
Quadzilla said:Funny thing is that Cyclone was at the dyno when we were consistantly making 465+ hp on an otherwise bonestock truck. The other funny thing is that when we loaded a tuner on a non biased stock truck at this same dyno is made almost 220hp??
Am I lying Chris?
sdaver said:what I try to do is make a run and immediately repeat it. If its the same maybe one more to put away controversy....If the numbers change and the second two are drastically different then its dumped.......30-40 runs per session are not uncommon when trying lots of things. Engine and tranny temp weigh into this trial also.....
Brandon those numbers you have with the quad are about what I get stacked w/ the 145........so did mackin and another friend from canada........heck man you got a good truck.
So quad no comments on the bullzilla theroy....your silence is deafning