Joined
·
9 Posts
I currently have an '84 Chev 6.2L Diesel Blazer and am looking for a 1989-1991 in exceptional condition using various auto sales sources, and am finding that there are very few diesel Blazers for sale. Any thoughts as to why?
Is there something I'm missing though? I have had nothing but good results from mine. Gas mileage at 20-25 (depending on the conditions), and still holding up great.grape;1537098; said:In an area as large as DFW, mine and now yours are the only 2 diesel K5's i know about.............
Well, the GM diesels of that time weren't exactly going through a period of tremendous popularity... This was right after the Oldsmobile diesel, after all... I still get people who think the 6.2 in my truck is an Olds built engine and wonder how it can possibly still be on the road.Is there something I'm missing though? I have had nothing but good results from mine. Gas mileage at 20-25 (depending on the conditions), and still holding up great.
Not that many were made, but it must be regional thing. I find them all over the place in the Northeast. I've got over 40 K5 diesel Blazers - many of them rust-bucket junkers. Most that I find are 83s or 86s. I've got six good ones that I drive, also two more with camper-bodies on them. I bought four just in the past few months - all running - price ranges from $50 to $700 - the $700 1988 Blazer being almost rust-free.Big Blue 84;1537063; said:I currently have an '84 Chev 6.2L Diesel Blazer and am looking for a 1989-1991 in exceptional condition using various auto sales sources, and am finding that there are very few diesel Blazers for sale. Any thoughts as to why?
I just saw that, looks like a really nice truck.nojoy467;1538442; said:I am in La Porte Texas east of Houston and have listed my 1990 Diesel V10 Blazer on EBay. If interested the EBay # is 130070407340 It is a real nice Blazer.
I am just looking for a later model. I am beginning to feel lucky I have one with the MPG so high. It has a small oil leak from the rear main seal, and other than that it sounds and drives great.High Sierra 2500;1537377; said:Well, the GM diesels of that time weren't exactly going through a period of tremendous popularity... This was right after the Oldsmobile diesel, after all... I still get people who think the 6.2 in my truck is an Olds built engine and wonder how it can possibly still be on the road.
I have also noticed there aren't many diesel K5s around. In the area where I live I know of one '83... I saw it for sale a while back. I also know of one military Blazer. Those are the only diesel Blazers in my area that I know of...
There's usually one or two on eBay, but it may be hard to find an '89-91. Don't mind me asking, but why are you looking for those years?
Funny thing is that 1982 was the biggest production year for the diesel Blazer and I've yet to ever see one. I've got a dozen 83s (some junkers in the field). I've got two 82 6.2 pickup trucks, and my farmer/neighbor still drives his K2500 1982 diesel truck. But no 82 diesel Blazers. Maybe it took a year for people in my area to find out they existed?Craig M;1543413; said:I always wondered why I mostly saw 82-84 diesel Blazers, I guess that chart shows why. I'm surpriised they waited unit 91 to drow the diesel option. Those are really low production number in the late 80's. Great data!!
1990 - 159 diesel blazers. I hydrolocked my 6.2 out in the middle of no where, and got her started again (didn't let the water drain out of the cylinders) it limped home, but when i tore into it I had 2 bent rods, and a bent valve. so i pulled it, and dropped a cheep 350 into it, the blazer was never the same. before i did all that, the motor had 215000 miles on it, no rebuilds and ran great.
):h :funnyposttime to modify the chart
The military DID purchase a lot of trucks, Blazers, ambulances, Humvees, etc. with 6.2s. Also purchsed many, many replacement engines - the 6.2s had very short life-spans overseas. The actual horsepwer and torque specs are no different than the civilian engines - except the military only used the J-code engines as far as I know (like you get in 3/4 and 1 ton civilian rigs). Highest rated 6.2 GM built was 155 horse at 3600 RPM and 260 lb. ft. of torque at 2000 RPM. These are SAE figures - used for comparison to other engine specs also using SAE. Don't be fooled by other postings using gross or flywheel specs. or assumed torque readings.dannytoro;1547140; said:Hello everyone,
I actually found this forum in reverse to this question. I note tons of military blazers and pick ups at the Government Liquadation site. Also there must be enough spare 6.2L diesel blocks to sink a small country, most selling for $50-80. I wanted to know what the engine was capable of, in non-turbo guise. In terms of horsepower and torque.