heartbeatcanada said:Did you use a tech 2 will dynoing????? Did you do a baseline stock run????? Later Jeremy
PEANUTGRWR said:NOPE, NOT GONNA BELIVE IT UNTIL SOCAL AND HIS PAGE BUDDIES HAVE DONE IT FOR THEMSELVES!!!!!!!!
Honest no doubt you "rolled" that number ... Point is, is it an accurate RWHP ???BMDMAX said:Mac,
It's the sweet Georgia air that makes the numbers better, no drugs necessary.
I knew that we would not find anyone to show with a Tech 2. Short of one of us laying out a couple of grand it just was not going to happen.
I asked the question a few weeks ago about dynoing in 5th and what it would do to the results. I am perfectly happy to question my own results, that is the only way I can make the truck better. How about one of you guys with the Tech 2 dynoing the same stack in fourth and then doing it in 5th for a comparison? Oh, by the way the GTech is pretty close to my dyno numbers too.
Like I said earlier, let's put them on the track and see how it shakes out.Would it make you happier if I put on my sig "515 HP Pretty F%$#^&IN far from Stock" ? LOL
No matter what you guys decide I can still take the heat.