cbiers -
Excellent pix. Very clean inside, even after 65k miles.
Clearly, it's evident that the service suggestions from Allison are right on. They recommend 100k miles on syn with external filter every 50k miles. I see no reason you cannot easily get 100k miles on the next load.
I also see this as evidence of why it's a complete and total waste to change an internal filter, except upon teardown. The "teardown" presumption is that there was some kind of catastrophic event in the tranny, and that the internal filter got loaded with debris. If you don't have a catastrophic event, then the internal filter is nothing to worry about at all. It should last indefinitely. The internal filter is coarse enough that it is ONLY for catching "chunks" should you shred the tranny. Other than that, it's openings in the media are too big to catch anything. If it cannot catch anything, then it's not being loaded. If it's not being loaded, there's no sense in changing it.
Imagine a screened-in porch and a chain link fence. Both are wrapped around your deck on the back of your house. The screen is very good at keeping out small insects. The chain link fence cannot stop insects, but it can stop a dog from passing through. The normal everyday operation of the chain-link fence has no bearing on the task of keeping small debris from getting onto the porch. Same goes for two Allison filters. The small spin-on (and magnet) are for stopping "normal" intrusion. The big internal filter is ONLY there "in case of emergency". Get the idea?
Changing filters too often is no better than changing oil too soon; both are a waste. They might make one "feel better", but there is no proof that there is any realized advantage to the equipment. Clearly, from the pictures, the spin-on and the magnet do all the "cleaning" work during normal operation. Service those according to the Allison schedule, and all will be fine.
Will it hurt to change the internal filter? No.
Will it help? No.
So why do people do it? Mis-guided false sense of security. But it makes them sleep better, so it's "right" for them.
If someone want's to convince me otherwise, then show me proof. Real proof; not some statement from Inglewood or Suncoast, but real particle-count lab analysis. Show me a "before and after" PC lab study that conclusively points toward the internal filter being a normal service requirement necessity.