JS32
07-24-2006, 07:38 AM
Hey guys,
I hooked up my boost fooler this weekend, using a 10K pot I grabbed on my way home from work Friday. The install went fairly easily as I had run my wires and sexed all my connections a few days before. I figured sexing the connections would allow me to put it all back stock if I ever wanted/needed to.
Anyway, I hooked it up, and took it for a test drive. Everything ran fine...no codes...10psi at WOT...and about 6 - 7psi while cruising. I was impressed. That was on Saturday.
The truck didn't move yesterday, but this morning on my way to work, the Check Engine light came on. The truck was sluggish, and I had no boost...even when I turned the pot all the way down. So...I pulled over, popped the hood, and hooked everything back up stock. Sure enough...the check engine light went out, and she ran fine all the way to work.
My question is...short of it being as simple as a loose connection, or is the baro seeing a value this morning in the rain/cool weather, that's causing too much of a disparity between it and the MAP?? Is this one of the reasons why the '95 S engines may/may not need a resistor inline with the baro?
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Jamie
I hooked up my boost fooler this weekend, using a 10K pot I grabbed on my way home from work Friday. The install went fairly easily as I had run my wires and sexed all my connections a few days before. I figured sexing the connections would allow me to put it all back stock if I ever wanted/needed to.
Anyway, I hooked it up, and took it for a test drive. Everything ran fine...no codes...10psi at WOT...and about 6 - 7psi while cruising. I was impressed. That was on Saturday.
The truck didn't move yesterday, but this morning on my way to work, the Check Engine light came on. The truck was sluggish, and I had no boost...even when I turned the pot all the way down. So...I pulled over, popped the hood, and hooked everything back up stock. Sure enough...the check engine light went out, and she ran fine all the way to work.
My question is...short of it being as simple as a loose connection, or is the baro seeing a value this morning in the rain/cool weather, that's causing too much of a disparity between it and the MAP?? Is this one of the reasons why the '95 S engines may/may not need a resistor inline with the baro?
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Jamie