This is where the discussion of the Dyno Days and Dyno runs should be posted:


This will archive the data and give a quick reference to those looking for info.


Thanks......let's post some numbers.


Thttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clown.gifNY

so copy them from the moderators forum......now

so copy them from the moderators forum......now


You can copy paste, mister http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif


They are in the open forums.........as long as you are registered and use the search feature you can find them.


I gotta date with a DYNO , myself.........


look here later if all goes well.


GO SUPERMAN---------------- GO


Thttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Embarrased.gifNY

http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/BD7_dyno1.jpgHere is a dyno chart we can start comparing with.


Mods:


Quadzilla Stealth Tuner 215hp


Quadzilla Injectors


Quadzilla Single Stage N20 kit with 62 jet.


Quadzilla Monster Air Intake


Built Trans.Edited by: Quadzilla

Well the best run i have made was a couple of weeks ago. Not stellar by any means. My baseliine has always been 215 to 225 at this dyno pending on air quality.(reads low on all vehicles) My best stack has been 215quad and 145 edge=459hp. Added some nos to that and got 589hp. That was my first run with the nos and still had small jets in, and my bottle pressure was quite low from trying it out too much on previous days. She still had some smoke, so i should be able to shoot some more nos in there and clean it up and get higher numbers. Hoping for 630+ on that dyno machine(prolly add 20hp to bring numbers up to norm from my baseline) Would like to run on another machine in the same day to varify though.


My bottle is filled and ready to go again hopefully tomorrow or Thursday, as well as trying something that should get results the same as or higher than King D's one box/programmer/pcm 498hp run. Key word is i"hope" that this works out like i have been told it should, as if it does this thing is gonna rock. We'll see, and i'll give you my opinion and numbers.


BTW all my runs are on a dyno jet and in 5th gear as, no access to a tech 2. Any spikes are not considered, if truck drops down into 4th. Later Jeremy

http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/9C1_king.jpg

not mine and never will be but man oh man............best I have seen to datehttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/HiHi.gif

Wow http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Shocked.gif those are some huge numbers. Who's truck laid these numbers down? Edited by: Kent Tuttle

Too bad they have to use a secondary fuel to do this. Also it seems they could bring the 2nd stage of N20 in a little smoother? I will post some good sheets in a few days.http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif





BTW our dyno sheets are on 100% completely bone stock fuel system through the cat!





Gotta love a guy that leans on others results.

quad i would love to see some dyno sheets on just the 215 and quadzilla injects.i think a post showing the extra 70-100 hp your injects make will go along ways towards answering the debate as to if the stock fuel system can really push more than the demands that high hp boxes like the 215 and tst comp and tts extreme call for with out modification.as far as a smoother second stage well when tuning sometimes it takes a while to get smooth power,you of all folks should realize this.and yes a secondary fuel system was needed to make these numbers but it appeared that if we wented more hp than 650 we needed more fuel.also i can get charts posted of up to about 680 with a stock fuel system for fair comparison if needed.i know 800 hp isnt that far off and await for it .i havent shot any drugs mysely lately kinda been running after 500 on #2 only but my new nos parts are here and i hope to get them installed and get some runs in asap.until then i will stand behind family powerhttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Thumbs Up.gif.also i hope to have big dipper post a new chart for me soon if i can figure out how to scan it and get it sent to him......

carrotzilla wrote:
"Gotta love a guy that leans on others results."..................It should have read: Gotta love a guy that learns on others results........Learned a little recently and yes I still have one to sell......Or maybe I can get it flashed to the bully dog 155..........

http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/HiHi.gif

carrotzilla wrote:
"Gotta love a guy that leans on others results."..................It should have read: Gotta love a guy that learns on others results........Learned a little recently and yes I still have one to sell......Or maybe I can get it flashed to the bully dog 155..........

http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/HiHi.gif





Are you still bitter because you keep spending money (on kryptonite apperantly) and are still going backwards?

Gotta love a guy that leans on others results.





I read this and really have to laugh......you have nothing to gain by comparing yourself to ...well in this case....farmers and brick layers....you are a vendor....tuner...... Seems to me it is a lose lose situation, but hey....to each there own.Edited by: BIG DIPPER

Not comparing, just showing what can be done with off the shelf parts. If I wanted to compare I would show the big dyno graphs, but there is no point, I agree 100%. There are many people running the same parts as I listed above with the same results, or better results than I posted.





Glad we agree on this.

http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/Dyno_7441.JPG

Hey guys, would you all post the type of dyno and the time it took to run the test. Sometimes the dyno will print out time from beginning of the test to the end. I know this might be hard on old test sheets you already have but regarding any new testing, be sure to ask the dyno operator for that information. Drum weights of the dyno would be helpful as well.


And while we are all it......world peace! http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif


I'm sorry if I'm asking for too much.


Signed,


Your Southern California Horsepower/Torque Research Scientist. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Cool.gif

Told ya my numbers were lame.http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Cry.gif

CARROTZILLA WROTE

"Are you still bitter because you keep spending money (on kryptonite apperantly) and are still going backwards?"

Alvin I have never gone backwards but I have learned a few things. The 215 has some issues like a surge at 30-40 mph and a rattle at highway speeds with light throttle that makes a old cummins seem quiet. Stacked with the edge it made less power and torque than the tts 120/edge stack. As a single tuner the first version of the extreme made more horsepower and torque than the 215 with no rattles no surges......just smooth power. All of the tunes on my quad tuner seem to have the same side effects except for the lowest one. So make your comments and promote your substandard tuner and when people expose you for what you are, go cry to nick and the moderators that their ruining my business and name when in reality you did it to yourself. Leaning on others is not my way, learning from them is. Hopefully some of your future customers will see you for what your are and LEARN from your comments here.

Still have one 215 for sale and its getting cheaper by the minute http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Ermm.gif Edited by: sdaver

We tested 2 quad 215 boxes back to back on the same truck within minutes of each other and they made 170 hp with a lot of smoke and a lot of noise. We were told that one of the boxes might be a ringer. Guess not.

Mikey Mikey Mikey?


And your point is?


The BIG Q.........5 runs/2 diff programs.........3 rwhp diff........OK.


The TTS Ex.......3 runs.........35 rwhp diff?..........was the Magic 412.1 on a fart or a burp? Couldn't tell from here.


To each their own I guess?


Hey SDaver you must have the Big Q priced high or are you afraid you'll miss it when it's gone?Edited by: JRmac

Well.........First off let me thank Unlimited Motorsports & Paint in South Windsor, CT for use of the Dyno, and a special thanks to Eric & Chad the owners for staying after hours and to Joe-aka-Geerhead for providing the TECH IIhttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clap.gif.


Here is the way it went down, we hooked the truck up had it ready to roll, BUT when the Tech II initialized on start-up it kept coming up with a keypad error. After spending a considerable amount of time trying to get it to work, Joe went for another Tech II but unfortunately that did not work out as the memory card was bad for the TECH II. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Cry.gif


So rather than waste the evening we referred to my previous runs from June 22, 2003 to see if we could make it work with the OD Lock-out switch and the tow/haul for converter lockup.


My original baseline was 248.HP/422TQ on 6/22/2003


My baseline tonight was 244HP/462TQ followed up by a 251HP/436TQ


At this point we decided that the numbers given my previous 30+ runs on file were good to go.


So this is it baseline run:


http://dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/Copy_of_t1.jpg





Hot OJ v 4.61 non attitude......393HP/722TQ


previous run 6/22/03 was 387HP/722HP


http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/HOT_OJ_120.jpg


Hot OJ/Attitude 145---borrowed from Mackin


Run 1 -- 396.9HP/710.9TQ


Run 2 -- 398.3HP/711.1TQ


http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/6AD_HOT_OJ_145.jpg


I had a VA Smart "E" 110/230 that we wanted to run.


the 110 tune put down 338HP/585TQ


the 230 tune put down 424HP/720HP backed up with 427.8HP/728.7TQ


http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/VA_230_.jpg





Run 1- Quad 215 old tune v 1.10 put down 428.8HP/787.7TQ


Run 2- Quad 215 new tune v 1.19 put down 430.0HP/803.0TQ


Run 3- Quad 215 new tune v 1.19 put down 430.8HP/810.0TQ


http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/Quad_215_new_tune.jpg





Quad 215 v1.19 tune/HOT OJ v4.61 non-attitude -464.6HP/789.1TQ


<IMG onMous

http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Approve.gif

Quad 215 tune+HJAT145 Stack = 443.7HP--782.6 Torque


http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/C9B_Dynojet.JPGEdited by: Trippin

Guy - our only problem is the dynojet viewer doesn't correctly reflect our runs... yours includedhttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Cry.gif. Dunno how many others have the same problem. i wish my runs looked like this when they came up on his screen @ the dyno:


http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/BC8_run.JPGEdited by: Diesel Power

I understand what your sayin....I'm just illustrating the fact that the dyno chart can read whatever we or the dyno operator want it to. The viewer in SAE was within about 3 hp and 11 ftlbs of my numeric print out. Notice I changed the correction factor from SAE to STD to show the higher numbers.http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif


Until we as a community agree on a set of standards.... comparing dyno charts from day to day....dyno to dyno.....coast to coast is just an exercise in futility. Turbo motors respond to load....so dynos with heavier drums will load the engine down under acceleration to a greater degree.... which will show higher numbers in the columns we all care about.


I think at the very least we should all start using one set of correction standards. SAE or STD.


Next let's agree on some sort of timed accel test beginning at some rpm or mph and accelerating over some given amount of time to the end point rpm or mph. Maybe then we can start to make sense of what the dynos are trying to tell us. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Confused.gif

Guy,


I belive most of us try to use SAE, but several things have to be taken into account and i honestly think there are too many of them to follow as a group. plus i'm sure some of us will disagree on the proper testing procedure as well. after all, we all have different opinions http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Embarrased.gif. its a lovely idea though. all i try to do is be consistent w/ my methods and hope for the best..


Nick

But SAE are the low numbers.....http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Cry.gif


Already in this thread we have SAE...uncorrected....and STD. Hmmm.

Good luck trying to "standerize" dyno testing among the participants here .....


To many fudge factors .... I didn't if spin the other night for the Tech II was malfunctioning .....


I have been an advocate of 1 to 1 ratio and SAE correction at best unless it's over correcting then no correction factor should be used ...


Mac Edited by: Mackin

It would be nice to have a standardized excel spreadsheet to display the runs and correction factors. All of my numbers I use to compare between sessions I correct to SAE. There is a couple of different veiwers for the dynojet one is limited and will only display 3 runs at a time the other has more graphing features and will display 12 runs. I would be glad to send the better one to someone willing to host it for the masses. Great info tony looks like the new 215 is just about the same as the old. How did the truck sound with the quad compared to the others? How was the idle? Heard some loud rattles last nite think it was just thunder but who knowshttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Approve.gif Edited by: sdaver

Superflow's Windyn is a freeware that can be used to view ANY Superflow Autodyn run and easily overlay multiple runs to compare...





Tony,


Why did the the numbers disappear in the middle? Looks like the PRM signal was getting lost.


FWIW, I try to use Raw wheel power and torque. If I used correction factors...





The Quad 215 curve looks pretty close to the shape one would expect but is definitely different on a load cell dyno and in the real world.


On edit: If you guys could lose the unimportant RPM parts of the chart, we could see a lot more shape to the curves. Seeing some charts start below 1k and finish at 4.5 k when the test was only 2.5 k to 3.5k makes the resolution poor. Edited by: Kennedy

Our charts are SAE.

Quad give me a call.

http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/EPM_Stock_baseline.jpg

dave - give me a call.. i will host the files..

Superflow's Windyn is a freeware that can be used to view ANY Superflow Autodyn run and easily overlay multiple runs to compare...





Tony,


Why did the the numbers disappear in the middle? Looks like the PRM signal was getting lost.


FWIW, I try to use Raw wheel power and torque. If I used correction factors...





The Quad 215 curve looks pretty close to the shape one would expect but is definitely different on a load cell dyno and in the real world.





On edit: If you guys could lose the unimportant RPM parts of the chart, we could see a lot more shape to the curves. Seeing some charts start below 1k and finish at 4.5 k when the test was only 2.5 k to 3.5k makes the resolution poor.


John,


The runs were saved as a Bitmap file by Eric at Unlimited, when I opened them to post them what you see is what I got. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Confused.gif They cannot be edited ..........I will try to retrieve the originals when I get back up there.


Mackin and my brother were whining they were hungry so I did not get a chance to get all of the info I wanted.......somebody did not want to miss American Idol or something http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/HiHi.gif http://dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/HiHi.gif http://dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/HiHi.gif http://dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/HiHi.gif http://dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/HiHi.gif


Seriously though, All of the runs were very close to my previous runs.


The surprising thing was how well the 4.61 Hot OJ runs against an Attitude 145........hardly any difference.





Sdaver,


Yes the Quad 215 tune is noisier than the Hot Edge or the Big VA 230, but at this time I do not beleive that it is harmful though,


In fact I hear more noise when I use tow haul coming down a hill ( stock programming ) and then switch to normal at the bottom and while accelerating out of the lower gear I hear a loud pilot rattle, much worse than anything else I have heard with any tune.


So,..........


I hope to get back on the dyno Saturday and make an

We know who's eyes were pegged to the screen in the bar and new names .... http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Shocked.gif





Me ,I was having a beer and looking at the menu twas a hard night sitting in the back seat ...


Sure did smoke the "painter" tho ,man he got flogged trapped between the door and car in next bay.... HUGE !!!!!!!!!!!!





Mac http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Approve.gif

I understand what your sayin....I'm just illustrating the fact that the dyno chart can read whatever we or the dyno operator want it to. The viewer in SAE was within about 3 hp and 11 ftlbs of my numeric print out. Notice I changed the correction factor from SAE to STD to show the higher numbers.http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif


Until we as a community agree on a set of standards.... comparing dyno charts from day to day....dyno to dyno.....coast to coast is just an exercise in futility. Turbo motors respond to load....so dynos with heavier drums will load the engine down under acceleration to a greater degree.... which will show higher numbers in the columns we all care about.


I think at the very least we should all start using one set of correction standards. SAE or STD.


Next let's agree on some sort of timed accel test beginning at some rpm or mph and accelerating over some given amount of time to the end point rpm or mph. Maybe then we can start to make sense of what the dynos are trying to tell us. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Confused.gif





A Dyno Jet operator can only change correction factors which will change the data based on those formula's. There are no other factors the operator can change or set to alter the runs.


STD correction was the standard here until SAE was developed and made the industry standard. DIN, EEC are european correction standards. STD in most all cases yeilds a higher number.


Use the correction factors to assist you with comparing dyno runs in different conditions, that is why it is there. Uncorrected is what you actually lay down during the run. On a nice cold day here in Georgia, uncorrected may be higher than SAE, and just the opposite during the summer. Correct both sets of runs and they should be very close.





BMDMAX has made summer runs at 505 uncorrected and SAE corrected to 515hp and 525hp uncorrected in the winter that corrected to SAE 515hp. This is the purpose of correcting the data.


Sdaver and I made Tech II passes in 4th gear then ran again in 5th and saw little or no change in the runs. 5th if I remember correctly, had a little more torque. So so far, from what I have seen, you can compare HP between 4th and 5th. I also would rather run in 4th for but one reason... if you have a speed limiter, you will never see peak HP in 5th because the limiter will stop the run before you reach peak.


In 5th with limiter removed, I see 260HP stock and with a limiter, about 240-245. I can lay the graphs on top of each other and the only difference is power continues to build beyond the speed limited run, but power is the same until then.


Comparing the amount of time a runs takes is not possible, at least between dyno brands anyway. Too many variables. Even Dyno Jet to Dyno Jet, depending on where you start the run will make a difference in overall time. Simulating a load will slow the run down as mentioned in another thread where the Superflow run was 15 seconds. I have done 700+hp runs on my dyno that lasted under 4 seconds.


If you run on a dyno that loads your truck, just make sure you have a good fan and airflow or you will see high temps quickly. An advantage to loading dynos is they can but not always show you a h

David http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clap.gif

You don't have to tell me about the speed limiter and dynoing in 5th. I've been up against this all along. It seems to be a problem as far as i know on all 01's my jellopy included. Hopefully that will be behind me shortly. Then we'll see how much it has been hindering my dyno numbers. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Approve.gif

If you just want to eliminate the speed limiter on the dyno, what happens if you just put the speed sensor off? If you are commanding it to 5th with a tech II anways, it shouldn't matter.

you command to 4th with a tech2

I don't have access to a tech 2, thats why the 5th gear runs. Prolly if you did screw with the speed sensor the truck would run like a bag of crap. At least this is the case with the sick(6) litre. Truck basically doesn't know electronically what load is there and such, from what i gather.

CT Trip.......





http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/926_run13.jpg

I take it those are Mackins runs, with the limiter still in, by the looks of it. The famous stack and a little bbq gas?????http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Ermm.gif

DavidTD,


Well said.


I wanted to chime in with the same thoughts on correction factors but you beat me to it.


Seems, I laid down last night to read bedtime stories to the kiddies and I woke up this morning wondering what happened. And it wasn't even alcohol induced. Must be working too hard.


Anyway back to the discussion. I agree totally....we need to use SAE corrected numbers to be able to have a chance at comparing numbers from season to season or coast to coast.


Now dyno to dyno is going to present more of a challenge. (Just as you stated) Hence the reason I was asking for the time during testing. Hoping, that if we were to come up with an acceleration rate we might have a chance of comparing results, i.e. if the Dyno Jet is allowing a truck to accelerate at say 5 seconds then we might be able to duplicate that with a Superflow. I realize the fundamental philosophy behind the Dyno Jet is the faster the engine accelerates the drum the more power that is calculated. Therefore higher powered trucks will have shorter test times. But I thought it might be the first step in our quest for dyno comparable Nirvana.

Well...........Nick was in town


So the CT boys headed to Unlimited Motorsports to roll.http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Cool.gif


Mackin rolled a "NICKLE" and a "DIME"........http://dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clap.gif


I was only able to put down a tranny crying, TC slipping 459hp/820tq with a Quad215/Hot OJ stack.


Heard the converter let go in 5th gear to see if it would hold in my truck.........


My run tonight was with a TECH II..4th gear .....TCC LOCKED....


Must be that cool New England Air......


Heading back on Saturday again http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif





Thttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clown.gifNYEdited by: GMC-2002-Dmax

Tony......You'er just plain crazy...ya fit right in. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/HiHi.gif http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif





Burner-------&gt; http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif


.....keep it up and you'll need a shopvac and a shovel to pick up your trans. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clap.gif

Tony......You'er just plain crazy...ya fit right in. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/HiHi.gif http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif





Burner-------&gt; http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif


.....keep it up and you'll need a shopvac and a shovel to pick up your trans. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clap.gif





I saw a Shop Vac in the corner..........think I'm gonna get a chimney brush for the Banks Exhaust though...........http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Confused.gif


The tranny is OK on the street with a HOT OJ.........BUT..........anything more than that and ZZIIINNNGGGGGGGGGGGGG !!!!!!!!!!!!http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Cry.gif


I hope to get my tranny soon.........then we will see what elsehttp://dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Embarrased.gif I get.


Gonna try a few new things on Saturday, I hope.





Thttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clown.gifNY

Hot OJ in 4? Just curious have you tried it stacked in other levels?

All number II ..... Have witness along with independent party turning off drug valve prior to run .....


BACKED UP ....

GO Mackin! Impressive!


Your killing me man!


More hard work ahead for me I guess! Can you at least let me get caught up before you raise the bar again? http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Cool.gif

GO Mackin! Impressive!


Your killing me man!


More hard work ahead for me I guess! Can you at least let me get caught up before you raise the bar again? http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Cool.gif





Gonna have to drive East........Trip, if ya wanna get it done.http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Embarrased.gif


Leave that tree hugging ..bunny loving .People's Republic of KALIFORNIA.http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Dead.gif


Go where the air is good and the diesel is better.........


East Coast guys know how to roll. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Cool.gif


Right NICK ?????? http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Embarrased.gif http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Embarrased.gif http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Embarrased.gif





Thttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clown.gifNY

nice numbers,makes me wanna go back to the dyno again....good job.question...when does northern east coast meet southern east coast ?i think it is time to start planning an event were we can all meet in a central local.

I'll second that of Jess. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Thumbs%20Up.gif http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clap.gif


Burner---------&gt; http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif

It was an awesome time at Unlimited Motorsports. It was getting quite cold with the doors open. Tony and Mac were trying to fill the place with smoke.


Nick is a great guy,, I'm glad I got to meet you. It was great seeing Bill, Jesse and the rest of the guys.


Mac has the highest torque #'s to date of anything run on the Dyno. Congrats!


APRIL 4TH there is a TRUCK CLASH at Englishtown Raceway in New Jersey. Anybody interested? Til Saturday........

http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clap.gif

All number II ..... Have witness along with independent party turning off drug valve prior to run .....


BACKED UP ....








Good numbers, Mackin! Congrats. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clap.gif Guess us Southern boys ain't so FOS after all, eh? http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Embarrased.gif

i made 575 last night on a dynojet 575 ....and backed it up several times ....hopefully this weeekend i can get some charts up ....i made about 40 runs with different combos

i made 575 last night on a dynojet 575 ....and backed it up several times ....hopefully this weeekend i can get some charts up ....i made about 40 runs with different combos this 575 with drugs or with out?????

nice numbers,makes me wanna go back to the dyno again....good job.question...when does northern east coast meet southern east coast ?i think it is time to start planning an event were we can all meet in a central local.


Well I started a new thread.........


North meest South (http://dieselplace.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5859&amp;PN=1&amp;TPN=1)





Thttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clap.gifNY

REGULAR JUICE/additude ?


http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/77D_Photo_2004_2_29_15_51_58_edited.jpg


http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/uploads/9Z9_Photo_2004_2_29_15_45_46.jpg

The 385HP/722Tq is very typical of a HOT Juice run..........


I have seen those numbers consisitently from Truck to Truck...Dyno to Dyno.


That is exactly what to expect...........also 2800 rpm peak is very typical as well...http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clap.gif





Thttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clown.gifNY

(The 385HP/722Tq is very typical of a HOT Juice run..........)





my run was not a hot juice run........regular juice run!!Edited by: RUMAXED

(The 385HP/722Tq is very typical of a HOT Juice run..........)





my run was not a hot juice run........regular juice run!!





Was the Attitude used in Level 5 ?????? if so that is the 120Hp tune.


A regular 90 HP tune will not put a number down like that.


Or am I missing something here http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Embarrased.gif


The old HOT OJ v4.61 was 120 HP on level 4......a regular new OJ With an ATTITUDE is 120hp ON LEVEL 5





Thttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gifNY

(The 385HP/722Tq is very typical of a HOT Juice run..........)





my run was not a hot juice run........regular juice run!!





Was the Attitude used in Level 5 ?????? if so that is the 120Hp tune.


A regular 90 HP tune will not put a number down like that.


Or am I missing something here http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Embarrased.gif


The old HOT OJ v4.61 was 120 HP on level 4......a regular new OJ With an ATTITUDE is 120hp ON LEVEL 5





Thttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gifNY





it must be me that is missing something........so mine is juice/additude


120........... yours is hot juice no additude 120.......if i went to hot juice/additude it would be 145.........and for you to get to 145 you need to buy the additude ?


I GUESS THAT MAKES ME A GREENGO ?

I have an old box from September 2002...one of the first--still non atttiude HOT OJ,


Yes you are correct, If I had a HOT attitude I could access the 145 HP tune, but I have just a HOT OJ.


It does just fine, actually puts a great number down http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Big Smile.gif.


Thttp://www.dieselplace.com/forum/smileys/Clown.gifNY