TCC was slipping, but got 176kW (=240hp) anyway

http://kojo.wippiespace.com/images/sekal/P241009_09.51.JPG

:) team Finland continues... at flywheel, 193kW (=262,5hp) and 615Nm

http://kuva1.kuvablogi.com/iso/img2322340.jpg

More pics of my Sub http://kuvablogi.com/nayta/1851599/

Nice numbers!

For us North Americans...

Kojo's numbers convert to 236hp and 348 ft lbs
And Kane's are 258hp and 452 ft lbs.

Kojo, you think your truck has way more in it if the TCC wasn't slipping?

The stats are almost the same (although no clue the tunes on the chips, so that could be a HUGE part) except for *** vs GM-4 + ATA IC, yet the truck with the smaller exhaust, and GM turbo and ATA is putting down 100 more ft lbs.

Are both Flywheel?

Webiste I used to convert (http://www.mr2ownersclub.com/converter.htm)

Nice numbers, I love dyno days, they make me all tingly and giddy

Nice converter whitek2500. Both are from flywheel, same dyno, same day.
I believe my truck has more power, but no way to get it out with current torque converter, it slips on road too if more then 2500rpm and i push pedal...
Tunes are almost same (i know because i have made both) Kane has gm-4 but self made turbomaster so ecm isn't controlling boost. Fuel tables are identical, i have little more timing advance on low rpm's but high end is almost identical (if i remember correctly there was only 0.2 degrees difference, tables are on my laptop and i'm now on home computer, but i can check them later. all other ecm related parameters are same.

If the numbers are from the flywheel (i'm guessing you are using a roller dyno) then I guess the dyno you go to estimates the power at the flywheel instead of giving real rear wheel power? Most of the dynos I've been to only give RWHP. What brand dyno was used?

I cant remember dynos mark, but it made somekind reverse power calculation to estimate flywheel power, my truck had 11% driveline loss so 156,6kW on rear wheels.

I cant remember dynos mark, but it made somekind reverse power calculation to estimate flywheel power, my truck had 11% driveline loss so 156,6kW on rear wheels.

Which is 210 HP at the wheels which is pretty good :thumb:. I'm just not used to having dynos calculate the flywheel power lol...

Dyno user told it was from only us manufacturer who agreed to do dyno counting flywheel power (shop wanted dyno like that)

Usually if someone wants to flywheel dyno a motor, the motor isn't in the vehicle. I can't imagine that the computer calculation would be 100% accurate. Considering drivelline loss is different in every transmission. Even if it the same type of transmission its still different rotational and friction loss. But good numbers anyway. 200+ HP on these motors is prety darn healthy if you ask me.

Yep, each truck has different loss. They make another "reverse" run to get driveline loss also.
So, no common formula for all dyno visitors :)

A flywheel dyno is the best (most accurate) but it is not always practical to pull a motor out of a truck just to dyno it. Rear wheel horsepower/torque is what you feel in the seat of your pants anyway. I wonder how much friction loss an Allison trans has.