Coyote hunters diesel
01-05-2009, 10:20 PM
Remember that jingle about the banks with their hands in your pockets. Catchy little tune isn't it. I can hear it now as I type.
Maybe the reason I can hear it so well is that I have GMC's hands in my pockets. In the commercial I believe it just shows the one hand in the person's pocket but I definately have two!
I just got back home from the local dealership where I took my 2007 GMC Sierra in for service and an ongoing issue with the transmission lines leaking. I fully expected to come out paying for the service and not paying for the transmission issue since this is a well documented issue with the Allison transmission in the GMC/Chevy series truck in cold weather.
Last winter in February I had the local dealer address the issue and they told me it was fixed. They replace one out of the three transmission lines and upgraded the computer program that was suppose to be causing this issue of leaking transmission lines during high idle in extremely cold weather.
Instead I came out of the dealership shaking my head and wondering why I had to pay $593.63 for an issue that GM knows is prevelant in thier line of diesel trucks. Last year the line was fixed for free. It never even lasted a year so in my mind it was not fixed at all.
Here is the kicker in my eyes. The service consultant told me that if last year I would have "payed for the repair" myself, then the warranty would have been a full year, however since I did not pay for the repair and it was under warranty that the coverage of the repair was only 3 months or 6000 kms. Now how the heck does that work? The other comment was that last year the line was replaced with OEM part with the same part number and wasn't tested to see if that would fix the repair, now this year the part has a different part number and has been tested and proven to solve the issue as claimed by the service consultant as he has said he personally talked to GM about this.
So last year, they knew full well that they had a major issue with these transmissions. I have heard stories of 80 or so of these vehicles at GN shops waiting to be repaired. They thought they had a solution but obviously it wasn't a correct or permenant fix, I the customer has to pay? I have to pay because it was under warranty, a warranty that they only cover for 3 months if it is on their dime but a full year if on my dime. How does that make sense. The fix is only as good as the amount of money I pay for it?
So here comes the part about "both" hands in my pocket. They just finished with one hand and soon enough our federal government is going to be helping these poor automakers out with a bailout program. The federal government said that they will be giving at a minimum 3.29 billion dollar bailout. Another dip into my pocket. I cannot see how a company cannot make ends meet by getting my money three different ways is beyond me. The original purchase, the repair, and the bailout!
Now don't get me wrong. This is not a GMC vs X brand issue, this is a GMAC warranty issue. I like the truck and have had good luck with it until now. Allison makes a decent product for the most part, but to only warranty a product for 3 months or 6000 kms because a customer does not pay full price for the repair that was under the original warranty clause is wrong in my opinion. To not have a tried, tested and true solution for a major problem in best selling truck and hoping that it works and telling the customer that now we have a better solution to the original problem but you are going to have to pay for it is wrong too.
I know there are a good many other GMC diesel truck owners out there and would like to hear your story about this issue and what they have done for you.
Greg
Maybe the reason I can hear it so well is that I have GMC's hands in my pockets. In the commercial I believe it just shows the one hand in the person's pocket but I definately have two!
I just got back home from the local dealership where I took my 2007 GMC Sierra in for service and an ongoing issue with the transmission lines leaking. I fully expected to come out paying for the service and not paying for the transmission issue since this is a well documented issue with the Allison transmission in the GMC/Chevy series truck in cold weather.
Last winter in February I had the local dealer address the issue and they told me it was fixed. They replace one out of the three transmission lines and upgraded the computer program that was suppose to be causing this issue of leaking transmission lines during high idle in extremely cold weather.
Instead I came out of the dealership shaking my head and wondering why I had to pay $593.63 for an issue that GM knows is prevelant in thier line of diesel trucks. Last year the line was fixed for free. It never even lasted a year so in my mind it was not fixed at all.
Here is the kicker in my eyes. The service consultant told me that if last year I would have "payed for the repair" myself, then the warranty would have been a full year, however since I did not pay for the repair and it was under warranty that the coverage of the repair was only 3 months or 6000 kms. Now how the heck does that work? The other comment was that last year the line was replaced with OEM part with the same part number and wasn't tested to see if that would fix the repair, now this year the part has a different part number and has been tested and proven to solve the issue as claimed by the service consultant as he has said he personally talked to GM about this.
So last year, they knew full well that they had a major issue with these transmissions. I have heard stories of 80 or so of these vehicles at GN shops waiting to be repaired. They thought they had a solution but obviously it wasn't a correct or permenant fix, I the customer has to pay? I have to pay because it was under warranty, a warranty that they only cover for 3 months if it is on their dime but a full year if on my dime. How does that make sense. The fix is only as good as the amount of money I pay for it?
So here comes the part about "both" hands in my pocket. They just finished with one hand and soon enough our federal government is going to be helping these poor automakers out with a bailout program. The federal government said that they will be giving at a minimum 3.29 billion dollar bailout. Another dip into my pocket. I cannot see how a company cannot make ends meet by getting my money three different ways is beyond me. The original purchase, the repair, and the bailout!
Now don't get me wrong. This is not a GMC vs X brand issue, this is a GMAC warranty issue. I like the truck and have had good luck with it until now. Allison makes a decent product for the most part, but to only warranty a product for 3 months or 6000 kms because a customer does not pay full price for the repair that was under the original warranty clause is wrong in my opinion. To not have a tried, tested and true solution for a major problem in best selling truck and hoping that it works and telling the customer that now we have a better solution to the original problem but you are going to have to pay for it is wrong too.
I know there are a good many other GMC diesel truck owners out there and would like to hear your story about this issue and what they have done for you.
Greg