janlamc
02-04-2005, 12:44 AM
This has been brothering me for months!
Six years ago my son and I rebuilt a 1989 K3500 with the LL4 engine. The engine rebuild was by a professioal shop machine shop. Everything else was done by the book, perChevrolet's service manuals and wiring diagrams, by us. This class III was in addition to his class VIII. Built to haul and stay on the road.
Last Fall I had an electrical problem that I couldn't solve, so I took it into the local Chevrolet dealer. The problem was a short in the "brake switch" which caused an ignition wire to short and damaged the battery cables to #1 battery. The manual called for #2 cable, we installed #1 to be safe.
The dealed had replaced both + and - cables with #4. Went from side mount to top mount. Said the side terminals were stripped. I questioned him (her) on the #4 wires being too small and was told not to worry that the #4 is large enough for the loads.
Is the dealer correct? Am I concerned about nothing?:confused:
Thanks again for your help from this GREAT forum.
Jan
Six years ago my son and I rebuilt a 1989 K3500 with the LL4 engine. The engine rebuild was by a professioal shop machine shop. Everything else was done by the book, perChevrolet's service manuals and wiring diagrams, by us. This class III was in addition to his class VIII. Built to haul and stay on the road.
Last Fall I had an electrical problem that I couldn't solve, so I took it into the local Chevrolet dealer. The problem was a short in the "brake switch" which caused an ignition wire to short and damaged the battery cables to #1 battery. The manual called for #2 cable, we installed #1 to be safe.
The dealed had replaced both + and - cables with #4. Went from side mount to top mount. Said the side terminals were stripped. I questioned him (her) on the #4 wires being too small and was told not to worry that the #4 is large enough for the loads.
Is the dealer correct? Am I concerned about nothing?:confused:
Thanks again for your help from this GREAT forum.
Jan